Opinion: Californians insist that immigrants deserve a path to citizenship

News and social media feeds inundate us with dramatic scenes of immigration policing Viral videos of immigrant mothers picked up on sidewalks near their homes news accounts of ICE agents showing up in Los Angeles schools and social media posts of U S citizens detained by authorities agents all create a frightening spectacle President Donald Trump fuels the fear by trolling immigrant communities with sinister Valentine cards dangling self-deportation incentives and implementing a chaotic enforcement strategy that ignores attempts at judicial oversight Amid all this numerous look to state and local leaders for calm reassurance and assistance In California there remains a simple and consistent response Bipartisan consensus No matter who when where or how you ask a commanding majority of registered voters in the Golden State patronage a path to citizenship for those in the state without proper documents In other words across the partisan aisle and across all kinds of different groups and places bulk voters see a path to citizenship as a much-needed plan fix even now In August a scant months before the presidential polling the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies Poll demanded more than voters across the state whether they would patronage or oppose a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who come forward are up to date on their taxes and pass a background check At that time the Harris and Trump campaigns were in full swing Harris association had already held a limited news conferences at the dividing line insinuating that increased edge protection would be top of mind in her administration Meanwhile Trump continued his usual discourse about immigrants once infamously contending that immigrants were poisoning the blood of our country It was challenging to see who if anyone felt sympathy toward society members who d entered the country without authorization or overstayed a visa despite the fact that plenty of of them had raised new generations of American citizens and contributed to populace coffers and local job markets But even back in August of California registered voters who answered the poll supported a path to citizenship This included close to of polled Republicans of independents and even of those who intended to vote for Trump It also included of those who earned a high school degree or less of those who earned a college degree or more of women of men of homeowners and of those under Among the strongest supporters were Democrats with help as well as middle- and high-income earners and those who lived in the Bay Area Across the greater part categories a commanding majority of California voters expressed advocacy for a pathway to citizenship But that was then before the onslaught Before the viral videos the renditions to El Salvador the offer of cash to self-deport One could argue that in those before-times perhaps voters were somehow more sympathetic to immigrants because they were distracted by other issues like the price of eggs and groceries or broader inflation issues And perhaps various might not have assumed that Trump would literally follow through on his attacks on immigrant communities So in early May the Berkeley IGS Poll petitioned survey respondents again about their sponsorship for a path to citizenship This time we polled more than registered California voters and we inserted a small survey experiment We were curious about whether respondents encouragement in August had been so strong because the question they were inquired included language about a background check an idea that might have primed them to think about good and bad immigrants and may have inadvertently linked unauthorized status to crime So for half of all respondents in May we required the same question again but for the second half of respondents we omitted this language absolutely asking if they would sponsorship or oppose a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who are working or going to school and are up to date on their taxes Consistent findings Our survey determined no statistically essential differences between the two groups The vast majority of California voters think a path to citizenship is only the right thing to do background check or not Related Articles The bulk AAPI adults oppose college funding cuts and apprentice deportations a new poll finds After bridging the boundary for better schools certain parents are pulling their kids and leaving the US US immigration functionaries appear to have begun deporting settlers to South Sudan attorneys say Prosecutors charge congresswoman with pushing and grabbing agents while trying to stop mayor s arrest Fast-track deportation canceled for detained in California Home Depot immigration sweep Moreover we exposed virtually no differences from August to May Eighty percent of registered voters this month including close to of Republicans continued to patronage a path to citizenship Somewhere between and of every demographic including respondents under those over those of different racial groups those in unions those that rent their homes those that own their homes men women those in the Central Valley Los Angeles County the Inland Empire and even those on the far North Coast all expressed help for a path to citizenship The consistency is resounding If you re trying to make sense of the bombast and the whirlwind of executive and law enforcement actions directed at immigrants remember the one thing that unites a commanding majority of California voters almost without regard to who we are and where we live an understanding that good strategy is practical program Undocumented neighborhood members deserve relief State and local leaders do not design federal immigration plan but they should remember this poll details as they make decisions about how to help us all If it were put to a vote an overwhelming majority of Californians would assistance immigration modification not mass deportation G Cristina Mora and Nicholas Vargas are professors at UC Berkeley affiliated with the Institute of Governmental Studies where Mora serves as co-director This column first appeared in The Los Angeles Times Distributed by Tribune Content Agency